I'm an entomologist and was surprised to see the Chrysalis name used.
From : Don Stackhouse
Me. It was really quite a logical choice, if you know a little about our
company's history.
'Way back in '92, Joe and I were both working
at Hartzell Propeller, and both involved in R/C as a hobby (in fact,
purely by coincidence we both started in R/C in 1969). We'd both been
experimenting with 1.5 meter R/C HLG's, trying all the "latest and
greatest" on the market and coming away very disappointed.
We collaborated on a design of our own, and six fuselages, 7 tails, 8
wings and about 150 hours on the computer later, we froze the design of
what really was a breakthrough airplane for that class.
Up till that point, there were built-up HLG's that could float on almost
nothing but had no range or penetration, and sheeted foam winged HLG's
that had penetrated well and had good range, but couldn't thermal on
anything less than a "Texas brick-lifter". The common wisdom
was that it was possible to have one or the other of those qualities, but
an airplane that could penetrate, range and still float was in violation
of the laws of physics. Our model shot that idea full of holes. It was
light, floated as well as the built up models, but could also launch,
penetrate and range like the other sheeted foam models.
After all that work developing it, we thought that maybe some of the
other club members might like one, and then there was that Northeast
Sailplane Products place, maybe they might like to sell a few and help us
recoup a little of our investment.
The only question was what to call it. We'd already picked a name for our
company (Joe's idea, "DJ Aerotech", as in "Don and
Joe", except if I'd thought of it I would have made it "Joe and
Don"), but we needed a company logo, and we needed a name for the
new model. I also wanted to come up with a distinctive paint scheme for
my personal ship.
I was sitting in front of my computer one morning, thinking about what to
call a model that had the float of a butterfly (and a lot of it's flying
style, too, the way it danced around in the slightest of air currents),
but tremendous range. In one of those "Eureka!" moments, the
image popped into my head, and instantly I knew the perfect name, the
logo for our company, and the paint scheme for my personal ship! What
butterfly is famous for incredible, globe-spanning range? The Monarch, of
course. Not bad as far as the other connotations of that name as
well.
I immediately sketched the idea for our logo, a butterfly (wearing helmet
and goggles and a big smile, if you ever get to see it sufficiently
enlarged to see the details) shown in flight superimposed over a globe.
Many years before, I'd made some extremely small (3/8" span) kites
that were scale models of a Monarch butterfly, complete with the entire
paint scheme including all the black lines and white spots (as well as
the antennae, with little knobs on their ends!), so I was very familiar
with the details. In 1992 we didn't have all that fancy
"morphing" software to do it for me, so I mentally had to
"morph" the fore-wing paint scheme so that the row of doubled
white spots followed the wing's trailing edge, and I morphed the
aft-wing's patterns to fit the planform for the V-tail. BTW, only a few
Monarchs were ever made with that paint scheme, and I did most of them.
It takes about 20-25 man-hours of work to hand-paint all the details,
which is an awful lot to invest in a model that in a competition
environment also seems to mimic the Monarch butterfly's durability and
lifespan. Really good HLG's do tend to wear out.
The Monarchs have been out of production for a long time, so there are no
photos of this paint scheme on our website anymore, but I could probably
take some and e-mail them to you if you'd like to see it. The original is
pretty beat up, but I still have it hanging on the wall here, along with
the prototype 2-meter Monarch that carries the same paint
scheme.
This established the pattern of naming our sailplane designs after
butterflies, such as the "Wizard", one of our later
series. The series that replaced both of those was originally going
to be called the Emperor series, but we decided that wasn't easy enough
to say, so we opted for "Spectre" instead. Our first .75
meter "Mosquito" class sailplane was the "Nymph", and
the no-holds-barred competition follow-on to that was to be called the
"Harvester" (a lot of our competitors had taken up our pattern
of naming airplanes after bugs, and as you probably know, a
"Harvester" is a small carnivorous moth that EATS OTHER
BUGS!!).
When it came to developing a built-up, lower cost sibling for the
Monarch, intended for beginners, sport flyers, and for folks looking for
a good first-choice for beginning the metamorphosis from whatever they
had been flying into the unique world of model sailplanes, the name was
obvious: "Chrysalis". Once again, I opted for a
"scale" paint scheme inspired by the chrysalis of a Monarch
butterfly. The colors aren't scale, but the pattern is the same, a
luminous solid color overall, with a two-tone stripe on the wingtip that
mimics the stripe on the base of the cap of the butterfly's chrysalis.
That's the plane in the photos on the Chrysalis HLG page on our
website.
Don Stackhouse
DJ Aerotech
|